About
Advocate S.K.Jha – For Online Legal Helps brings over two decades of extensive legal experience, grounded in regular practice before the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Patna and various district and subordinate courts across Bihar and Delhi. With more than 22 years in the legal field, the professional involvement spans across multiple branches of law, reflecting a deep understanding of both litigation and advisory roles. Regular appearances before trial and appellate courts have contributed to a practice marked by procedural diligence and legal precision.
The areas of legal practice include a wide spectrum of civil matters—such as property disputes, land possession issues, partition suits, and contractual disagreements—as well as criminal litigation, which often involves filing for bail, anticipatory bail, quashing of FIRs, and trial representation. The practice also addresses writ petitions in both civil and criminal contexts under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. Family law is another significant component, encompassing divorce proceedings, maintenance claims, domestic violence issues, and custody matters. Corporate-related legal drafting, agreements, legal notices, and vetting of legal documents also form part of the advisory scope.
With appearances in judicial forums such as Tis Hazari and Saket District Courts in Delhi, the legal work benefits from exposure to varied regional procedures. The practice is designed to assist individuals across diverse socio-economic backgrounds with accessible and dependable legal support. Special emphasis is placed on providing **online legal advice and guidance**, enabling individuals to seek clarity on legal concerns remotely—through structured communication and document review—particularly beneficial for those unable to access physical legal consultations.
This website, Online Legal Helps, serves as an informational resource and a medium to support online legal engagement. It facilitates understanding of legal rights and procedures while enabling timely and responsible correspondence for genuine legal queries. The commitment to legal ethics, impartial advice, and continuous learning remains central to the practice, with each matter handled in alignment with judicial fairness and professional responsibility.
Practice Areas
Information regarding general domains of legal practice. For detailed information on specific areas, please refer to the linked pages (to be created by the advocate). This list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute solicitation.
Judgments / References
A selection of reported judgments for reference. Click to view the judgment directly on public domain portals like Indian Kanoon, Judis.nic.in, etc. (Paste your direct links below).
Arnesh Kumar vs. State Of Bihar & Anr; on 2 July, 2014 - Supreme Court of India
Aforesaid judgment applicable in all cases, where the arrest of a person is not required under Section 41(1), Cr.PC, the police officer is required to issue notice directing the accused to appear before him at a specified place and time. Law obliges such an accused to appear before the police officer and it further mandates that if such an accused complies with the terms of notice he shall not be arrested, unless for reasons to be recorded, the police office is of the opinion that the arrest is necessary. At this stage also, the condition precedent for arrest as envisaged under Section 41 Cr.PC has to be complied and shall be subject to the same scrutiny by the Magistrate as aforesaid."]
View Judgment OnlineSushila Aggarwal vs. State (Nct Of Delhi), on 29 January, 2020 - Supreme Court of India
This Court holds that the protection granted under Sect.438 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC)—which deals with anticipatory bail—should not be automatically limited to a fixed time period. The benefit of anticipatory bail can extend to the accused without any rigid time restriction. However, standard conditions under Section 437(3) read with Section 438(2) should generally apply. If the facts of case warrant it, the court has the discretion to impose specific conditions. Regarding the second issue, the Court clarifies that the duration of A.B. does not automatically expire when the accused appears in court or when charges are framed. It can continue until the conclusion of the trial, unless the court, based on exceptional circumstances, decides otherwise."]
View Judgment OnlineDr. M. Ismail Faruqui vs. Union Of India And Other, on 24 October, 1994-Supreme Court of India
The petitioners argued that, as a mosque is inherently a place of religious significance, its acquisition by the State amounted to a direct infringement of Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution, which safeguard the rights to freely practice, profess, and manage religious affairs.They contended that the Ayodhya Act, 1993, was discriminatory in nature, as it appeared to favour the interests of the Hindu community while marginalizing the rights of Muslims.The petitioners emphasized that this provision effectively denied the Muslim parties their fundamental right to seek judicial remedy, without offering any alternate forum or mechanism to assert or defend their legal claims. "
View Judgment OnlineStay updated with verified public domain legal sources:
A nominal support fee of ₹250 is applicable for specific online legal support and help .
Process:
- support Fees ₹250/-only/per10 minutes via any method below.
- Send payment confirmation via WhatsApp: Confirm Payment
- You will receive scheduling details within 1–2 working days.
1. QR Code Scan & Pay Fees:
(Scan to pay. Ensure to replace `YOUR_UPI_ID_HERE` and `[Your Full Name]` in the QR data if you generate a new one.)
2. UPI Payment Link:
Pay ₹250 via UPI AppNote: All advice provided is confidential and maintains professional standards. This service is subject to availability and prior confirmation.
Legal Articles / Blog
This section features informational articles and insights on various legal topics, developments, and general legal awareness. These are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. Full articles are typically hosted on separate posts within this Blogger site.
Waqf Amendment Act 2025 Sparks Political Controversy:
Waqf Amendment Act 2025 Sparks Political Controversy: Intended to improve waqf property management, the Waqf Amendment Act 2025 has ignited political tensions in India. The law’s overlap with sensitive issues like religious identity, minority rights, and constitutional freedoms has turned a legal reform into a flashpoint in national political and social discourse.
Read Full ArticleArticle 142 vs.143 Constitutional Clash: President Murmu’s Landmark Reference and Supreme Court’s Role:
Constitutional Law: Advisor vs. Binding Rulings, Two critical legal doctrines are at play: Advisory Opinions vs. Binding Judgments: Article 143 allows solicitations for advice, but such outcomes don’t carry the weight of Article 141 binding precedents, though they can influence future
Read Full ArticleWhat to Do, If the Builder Does not Pay or Handover Maintenance? What Can a Resident Welfare Association (RWA)?
While RERA Act, 2016, ensures transparency in property transactions and timely possession, maintenance charges and handover of common area management are often stuck in legal and practical limbo.So, what remedies are available to RWAs when the builder refuses to cooperate? Here's a comprehensive guide.
Read Full ArticleInformational Videos
Click the links below to watch our informational videos on YouTube. These will open in a new tab.
Contact Information
For professional inquiries, you may use the following contact details. Please note that unsolicited communication does not create an advocate-client relationship.
Chamber/Office-Danapur,Patna,Bihar-801503.
[YourWebsiteDomain.com] (If applicable)
Office Hours: [e.g., Monday -Saturday 10:00 AM - 6:00 PM (By Appointment Only)]
Professional Correspondence
For document exchange, non-urgent brief queries, or formal scheduling of initial (non-paid) discussions, please use the following channels: